Part 26
Demonstration, Validation & Public Credibility Strategy
How the programme shows real progress to executives, scientists, institutions and independent reviewers without a demonstration becoming an argument. Every public claim traceable to an evidence package; every demonstration bound to a registered protocol; every failure recorded rather than re-run.
Completion artifacts
These documents must exist, be internally reviewed and be baselined before the next Part begins. Status here is the artifact's real state, never its intended state.
AQ-SDD-001
Scientific Demonstration Dossier
Seventeen sections with the pre-registration boundary at section 9.
Drafted
AQ-SDD-001-S1
Worked dossier — Scenario 1
Sections 1-9 as they would be registered before the first run.
Drafted
AQ-SCN-002
Scenario 2 — Degraded information
Five injections, each with the domain it must affect and its failure criterion.
Drafted
AQ-SCN-003
Scenario 3 — Compound system stress
Combined degradation, timing constraint and computational pressure.
Drafted
AQ-EVIDENCE-WALL
Claim register
Seven-field entries; three-step navigation; struck claims stay visible.
Drafted
AQ-PUBLIC-CLAIM-GATE
Claim approval procedure
Six stages, five decision states, independence requirement.
Drafted
AQ-CEO-BRIEF-001
Executive capability briefing
Eight slots with prohibited content named per slot.
Drafted
AQ-INST-BRIEF-001
Institutional briefing
Ten sections plus the six-item pre-collaboration inspection set.
Drafted
AQ-IOP-001
Independent Observer Protocol
Twelve stages including the permanent disagreement record.
Drafted
AQ-INDEPENDENT-REVIEW
Technical reviewer protocol
Seven stages ending in a published-dissent right.
Drafted
AQ-DEMO-FAIL-001
Failed demonstration protocol
Seven steps; no quiet re-run; unreproducible failure is the graver finding.
Drafted
AQ-DVC-001
Demonstration version control
Nine mandatory fields, each tied to the failure it prevents.
Drafted
AQ-DEMO-ARCH-001
AQ-NODE demonstration architecture
The eleven-stage loop and the six distinctions it must make visible.
Drafted
AQ-DEMO-UI-001
Control room panel specification
Twelve panels, each bound to a named data source. Implemented at /akasha-q/demo.
Drafted
AQ-UNC-001
Uncertainty visibility model
Six bands mapped to trust state and operational consequence.
Drafted
AQ-LANG-001
Language discipline standard
Worked pairs of unsupported versus evidence-aligned wording.
Drafted
AQ-SHOW-001
Public research showcase
Ten sections; failures precede evidence, deliberately.
Drafted
AQ-DML-001
Demonstration maturity ladder
DM-0 to DM-6 with claim and non-claim sets per level.
Drafted
AQ-CRED-001
Credibility timeline
Four bands mapped to AQ-GATE-04 through AQ-GATE-08.
Drafted
AQ-TRUST-001
External trust architecture and metrics
Six checkable components; thirteen metrics with no invented targets.
Drafted