← Part 12

AQ-Y1A-001

The Y1 subset only: the elements the bootstrap laboratory will build, each traced to a Part 12 layer and a stage gate, with the observe-only rule for AQ-TSE-01 and an explicit exclusions table so scope creep stays visible.

Charter artifact · gated by Part 12 · revision 0, draft for internal review

AQ-Y1A-001 — Year-1 Prototype Architecture

SCOPE AND STANDING

This document defines the Y1 tier subset only: the elements the bootstrap laboratory intends to build in the first year, funded from EduRankAI revenue and disciplined reinvestment. External capital, partnership and collaboration would accelerate this work; none of it is a precondition for the work existing. Nothing here has been built and no element has reached laboratory validation; every entry is an intended design with a target evidence level, not an achieved one.

Year-1 stays entirely on rung 1 of the reach ladder — the optical bench. It does not advance to metro fibre, free-space, HAPS relay, CubeSat, operational satellite or constellation. The purpose of Year-1 is not a link; it is to prove that the trust architecture behaves as specified when the physical layer is deliberately trivial, so that later rungs inherit a boundary discipline that has been exercised rather than assumed.

Y1 ELEMENT REGISTER

IDElementLayerTierGateTarget evidence level at Y1 close
Y1-E1Optical bench with environmental sensing; source, attenuation path, detector chain, enclosure and reference frameL0Y1Y1-G1Lab validation
Y1-E2Entropy source with online health tests; raw and conditioned paths separated across TB-2L1Y1Y1-G1Lab validation
Y1-E3FPGA deterministic acquisition: framing, sequence numbering, timestamp attachment, saturation and dropout codingL1 / L2Y1Y1-G2Lab validation
Y1-E4Timing subsystem: local oscillator, discipline state machine, holdover accounting, uncertainty reportingL2Y1Y1-G3Lab validation
Y1-E5Identity and signing: key custody on the node, frame and decision-record signing behind an algorithm-agile interfaceL3Y1Y1-G4Lab validation
Y1-E6AQ-TSE-01 trust state engine, observe-only (see below)L4Y1Y1-G5TheoryLab validation
Y1-E7Command authority with hardware gate at TB-4 driving a benign bench effect onlyL5Y1Y1-G6Lab validation
Y1-E8Evidence and provenance fabric: append-only store, acceptance contract, export, reconstruction toolL6Y1Y1-G6Lab validation
Y1-E9Two-article configuration (AQ-NODE-01, AQ-NODE-02) over a wired bench link, N=2 exactlyL7Y1Y1-G7Lab validation
Y1-E10Configuration control, hazard log, conformance and absence-campaign harness, gate recordsL9Y1Y1-G0Lab validation
Y1-E11Offline advisory analysis over exported evidence, out of loopL8FRConcept

BENCH TOPOLOGY

Figure 1 - Year-1 bench configuration, N=2, single rung of the reach ladder

   AQ-NODE-01 (bench)                    AQ-NODE-02 (bench)
 +--------------------------+          +--------------------------+
 | L0 optical bench + env   |          | L0 optical bench + env   |
 | sensing          (TB-1)  |          | sensing          (TB-1)  |
 +------------+-------------+          +------------+-------------+
              | PHY frames                          |
 +------------v-------------+          +------------v-------------+
 | FPGA acquisition + stamp |          | FPGA acquisition + stamp |
 | L1 / L2          (TB-2)  |          | L1 / L2          (TB-2)  |
 +------------+-------------+          +------------+-------------+
              |                                     |
 +------------v-------------+  wired   +------------v-------------+
 | L3 identity / signing    |  bench   | L3 identity / signing    |
 | L4 AQ-TSE-01             |<-------->| L4 AQ-TSE-01             |
 |    OBSERVE ONLY   (TB-3) |  link    |    OBSERVE ONLY   (TB-3) |
 +------------+-------------+ AQ-ICD-  +--------------------------+
              |               NET-001
              | shadow outcome (recorded, not applied)
 +------------v-------------+
 | L5 command authority     |
 | Q1 Q2 Q3 -> hardware gate|
 | Q4 evaluated + recorded  |
 |            (TB-4)        |
 +------------+-------------+
              | gate signal; fail-state = non-acting
 +------------v-------------+
 | benign bench effect      |
 | shutter / indicator load |
 | no effect leaves the lab |
 +------------+-------------+
              |
 +------------v------------------------------------------------+
 | L6 Evidence & Provenance Fabric, both articles      (TB-5)   |
 +------------+------------------------------------------------+
              | export only
 +------------v-------------+
 | L8 advisory analysis     |  reads exported evidence.
 | offline, out of loop     |  No return path into L4 or L5.
 +--------------------------+
OBSERVE-ONLY RULE FOR AQ-TSE-01

Throughout Year-1, AQ-TSE-01 runs in observe-only mode. It ingests its closed input set, computes a trust state (NORMAL / RESTRICTED / CRITICAL / DENY / RECOVERING) and emits it to the Evidence Fabric. Its output is not an input to the TB-4 hardware gate. Q4 is evaluated and the outcome it would have produced is recorded as a shadow outcome; the executed outcome is determined by the Q1–Q3 hard constraints alone.

  • Every command record carries three fields: executed_outcome (from Q1–Q3), shadow_outcome (what Q4 would have returned), and divergence (true where they differ).
  • Observe-only is permitted only while the physical effect is confined to the benign bench load defined in Y1-E7. If any effect with consequence outside the enclosure is ever wired to the gate, observe-only is withdrawn on that article immediately and Q4 becomes binding.
  • Observe-only does not relax DC-4: the engine must still degrade monotonically on a single qualifying observation and still refuse to raise state outside the recovery sequence. What is suspended is only the effect of its output, never its discipline.
  • Promotion criterion out of observe-only: a recorded divergence corpus across the full absence campaign and failure-injection set, with every divergence explained and no unexplained execute where the shadow outcome was deny. Promotion is a gate decision by L9, recorded, and is not a configuration flag an engineer may set.
  • The mode flag itself is carried on AQ-ICD-TRUST-001 and written into every evidence record, so that no future reader can mistake an observe-only run for a binding one.

STAGE GATES

GateQuestion it answersExit criterionMaturity
Y1-G0Is the configuration under control?All six ICDs at S2; hazard log open; conformance harness runs and can failDM-0
Y1-G1Does the bench measure what it claims?Channel inventory calibrated; noise floor and entropy health-test metrics defined and measured, with the measured values becoming the first targetsDM-0
Y1-G2Is acquisition deterministic across TB-2?Frame sequence provable; dropout, saturation and partial-frame conditions each produce their distinct code under injectionDM-1
Y1-G3Is time reported honestly?Discipline state and timestamp uncertainty present on every frame; holdover growth measured, not modelled and reported as measuredDM-1
Y1-G4Is provenance bound to identity?Frames and decision records signed; key custody documented; algorithm substitution exercised at least onceDM-1
Y1-G5Does trust degrade as specified?Single-observation degradation, refusal to self-raise, and full recovery sequence all demonstrated under injection, observe-onlyDM-1
Y1-G6Can the system refuse?abstain, safe-hold and deny each produced and recorded; gate fail-state confirmed non-acting on signal loss; no effect precedes evidence acceptanceDM-2
Y1-G7Is the record sufficient on its own?An external reviewer reconstructs a forced degradation and a forced abstention across both articles from exported evidence alone (DC-5)DM-2

Gates are sequential in dependency, not in calendar. A gate may not be passed by argument: it is passed by an injection run whose records are archived, or it is not passed. No numeric performance target is set anywhere in this document; where a target belongs, the metric is defined at Y1-G1..Y1-G4 and its first value is whatever measurement returns.

EXCLUSIONS — DELIBERATELY NOT IN YEAR-1

This table exists so that scope creep is visible as a change request rather than as a surprise. Anything below entering Year-1 work without an L9-recorded admission is a scope breach.

ExcludedWhy not in Year-1Owning tierAdmission condition
Quantum key distribution of any protocolRequires a characterised physical layer and a threat model neither of which exists; would also invite claims the evidence cannot supportFRY1-G1..G4 closed; separate protocol and assumption-set document baselined
Free-space optical linkRung 2 of the reach ladder; adds pointing, atmosphere and alignment before the trust architecture is exercisedFRBench rung demonstrated end to end at DM-2
Metro fibre or any link outside the enclosureIntroduces an uncontrolled environment into a boundary-discipline experimentFRAQ-ICD-NET-001 at S3; environmental envelope defined
HAPS relay at 20–30 kmRung 3; airborne integration and dynamic platform behaviour are a distinct evidence levelLHField validation achieved on rungs 1–2
CubeSat, operational LEO satellite, constellationRungs 4–6; no space element is designed, procured or planned for Year-1LHDynamic platform evidence level reached and reviewed
Any airborne or space hardware qualificationEnvironmental and radiation qualification is not a Year-1 activity in any formLHPlatform programme entry, separately gated
Multi-node beyond N=2Membership, partition and quorum semantics are undefined above N=2 at the current tier; building them would create untested behaviourFRAQ-ICD-NET-001 extended and baselined for N≥3
Any learned or adaptive component in the decision pathWould make a consequential transition non-reconstructable and would place a non-deterministic element inside Q1–Q4No admission condition. Structurally prohibited at every tier.
L8 analysis connected in loopL8 is advisory only; in Year-1 it is not merely advisory but physically disconnected, reading exported evidenceFRAdvisory outputs may only ever annotate, never enter an input contract
Mobile, vibrating or dynamic platform testingConfounds a bench characterisation with platform effectsFRBench baseline measured first
Third-party or external key custodyKey custody model is not baselined; external custody adds an unmodelled partyFRL3 custody document baselined
Visvambhara integrationVisvambhara is a separate aerospace programme and the first platform designed to carry an Akasha-Q terminal; it is not a Year-1 dependency in either directionLHTerminal article defined; joint interface document opened under the shared restricted-access record
Any demonstration above DM-2Public capability demonstration outranks the evidence that will existEvidence level reached first, claim written second
CLAIM DISCIPLINE FOR YEAR-1 OUTPUTS

No Year-1 output may be described as operational, space-proven, satellite-ready, unhackable, impossible to intercept, or information-theoretically secure at system level. A passed gate licenses exactly one sentence: the named metric, the measured value, the assumption set it was measured under, and the evidence level. Ambition belongs in what is built; restraint belongs in what is claimed.

OPEN ITEMS CARRIED INTO Y1-G0

  • AQ-ICD-NET-001 is at S0 and blocks Y1-E9; it must reach S2 before the second article is wired.
  • The benign bench effect for Y1-E7 must be selected and hazard-assessed such that its worst-case assertion is harmless with the gate stuck asserted.
  • The divergence corpus format for observe-only promotion is undefined and must be fixed before Y1-G5, not after, so the corpus is not retrofitted to the conclusion.
  • The absence campaign harness in Y1-E10 must be able to fail the system; a harness that has never produced a failure has not been shown to work.